|> Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
|>
|> > James Antill <james@and.org> writes:
|> >
|> > |> unlikely() also needs to be...
|> > |>
|> > |> #define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!(x), 1)
|> > |>
|> > |> ...or...
|> > |>
|> > |> #define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
|> >
|> > This is not needed, since only 0 is the likely value and !! does not
|> > change that.
|>
|> Yes it is, given the code...
|>
|> struct blah *ptr = NULL;
|>
|> if (unlikely(ptr))
|>
|> ...you'll get a warning from gcc because you are implicitly converting
|> from a pointer to a long.
You're right, seems like __builtin_expect is really only defined for pure
boolean values.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something Andreas.Schwab@suse.de completely different." SuSE Labs, SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/