"The algorithms implemented here seem to be a completely new
invention, and I'll publish the fundamentals in a paper."
It defines two generic hash table classes using C preprocessor macros,
a "fuzzy" hash and an ordinary hash.
The "fuzzy" hash class is useless without a description. What does
find_hash_fuzzy do?
The ordinary hash class maintains an ring-ordered doubly-linked list
of entries for each hash synonym, and it performs a move-to-front
heuristic on insertion (but not for the find operation).
The second and final comment ("HASHSIZE _must_ be a power of two!!!")
does not apply to the ordinary hash class.
Would anyone care defend either of these hash classes?
-josh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/