Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()

Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:00:55 -0400


On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:29:05PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Well, there are two things happing in that patch. Per-hash chain
> locks for the page cache itself, and the lock added to the address
> space for that page list.

Last time I looked, those patches made the already ugly vm locking
even worse. I'd rather try to use some of the rcu techniques for
page cache lookup, and per-page locking for page cache removal
which will lead to *cleaner* code as well as a much more scalable
kernel.

Keep in mind that just because a lock is on someone's hitlist doesn't
mean that it is for the right reasons. Look at the io_request_lock
that is held around the bounce buffer copies in the scsi midlayer.
*shudder*

-ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/