Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better
Chris Dukes (pakrat@www.uk.linux.org)
Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:08:29 +0100
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:08:10PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Those drives should be blacklisted and rejected as soon as someone tries
> > to mount those pieces rw. Either the drive can make guarantees when a
> > write to permanent storage has COMPLETED (either by switching off the
> > cache or by a flush operation) or it belongs ripped out of the boxes and
> > stuffed down the throat of the idiot who built it.
>
> In which case you can choose between ancient ST-506 drives and SCSI
I thought that Andre had some information as to which devices were
compliant and which weren't.
--
Chris Dukes
The law is a code that isolates justice from public participation.
-- Stephen Marhall
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/