Re: Whats in the wings for 2.5 (when it opens)

[Crutcher Dunnavant]

++ 22/09/01 12:59 +1000 - Keith Owens:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:58:06 -0400, 
> Crutcher Dunnavant <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >A cleaner handling of module parameters/cmd line options.
> 
> That comes out as a side effect of kernel build 2.5, every object gets
> -DKBUILD_OBJECT to define the name it is known by.  From
> Documentation/kbuild/kbuild-2.5.
> 
>       -DKBUILD_OBJECT=module, the name of the module the object is
>         linked into, without the trailing '.o' and without any paths.
>         If the object is a free standing module or is linked into
>         vmlinux then the "module" name is the object itself.
>         Automatically generated.
> 
> Post kbuild 2.5 I will be writing a generic parameter/command line
> interface so you can insmod foo bar=99 or boot with foo.bar=99.  You
> will even be able to boot with foo.bar=99 when foo is a module, insmod
> will use the command line as a default set of values.

Well, that certainly is clean. How deep does it go? For instance, can
we you define it as:

	foo.bar.baz.bat.quux=99 -> mod 'foo.bar.baz.bat', parm 'quux'

so we get naming schemes like:

	net.3com.3c501.i=5

This would help much with keeping some of the namespaces cleaner. Do you
want any help with this?

-- 
Crutcher        <[e-mail]>
GCS d--- s+:>+:- a-- C++++$ UL++++$ L+++$>++++ !E PS+++ PE Y+ PGP+>++++
    R-(+++) !tv(+++) b+(++++) G+ e>++++ h+>++ r* y+>*$