my new patch does the early COW.
> However, your patch isn't right for another reason: if we do delete it
> from the swap cache, we'd better mark it dirty so that it gets
> re-allocated a swap entry if it later on needs it.
>
> That's why the old code went to such extremes: it marked it dirty and
> writable if it was a write access (and exclusive), and it marked it _just_
> dirty and removed it from the swap cache if it went over the swap limit.
agreed.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/