Re: [PATCH] /dev/epoll update ...
Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:05:02 -0400
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:43:57PM -0500, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
> Sorry, bad editing, that should be:
>
> Assume a large but bursty current of low bandwidth
> high latency connections instead of a continuous steady
> flood of high bandwidth low latency connections.
Isn't asynchronous io a better model for that case?
-ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/