Same here. In a quite number of cases, even_faster is actually slower.
Not always, though. I suspect the measurement is not really exact.
> Thanks,
> Petr Vandrovec
> vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
>
>
> Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $
> clear_page() tests
> clear_page function 'warm up run' took 13967 cycles per page
> clear_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 9298 cycles per page
> clear_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 9284 cycles per page
> clear_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 8508 cycles per page
> clear_page function 'faster_clear_page' took 4016 cycles per page
> clear_page function 'even_faster_clear' took 3916 cycles per page
>
> copy_page() tests
> copy_page function 'warm up run' took 15118 cycles per page
> copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 17002 cycles per page
> copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 16978 cycles per page
> copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 15163 cycles per page
> copy_page function 'faster_copy' took 8569 cycles per page
> copy_page function 'even_faster' took 8805 cycles per page
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/