Re: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:49:11 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: M. Edward Borasky: "RE: How much performance hit from running SMP kernel on UP box?"
Previous message: Neulinger, Nathan: "How much performance hit from running SMP kernel on UP box?"
Next in thread: David Howells: "Re: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem"
Reply: David Howells: "Re: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem"

> Okay preliminary as-yet-untested patch to cure coredumping of the need> to
>hold the mm semaphore:

If you want codd for this its in the older -ac tree. Linus decided it wasnt
justified so it went out
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: M. Edward Borasky: "RE: How much performance hit from running SMP kernel on UP box?"
Previous message: Neulinger, Nathan: "How much performance hit from running SMP kernel on UP box?"
Next in thread: David Howells: "Re: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem"
Reply: David Howells: "Re: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem"