> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:25:09PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > My point is: we're not going to start aging pte's until we have a
> > zone shortage, right ?
>
> correct, so we don't waste time if there's only filesystem cache
> pressure during the whole kernel uptime (not an unlikely scenario if you
> have enough ram like on servers).
>
> > I really think this will cause problems in practice, Andrea.
>
> yes, this hiding could infact explain the report you posted. I'll try to
> reproduce with highmem emulation and to fix it as soon as I can
> reproduce, also if you are interested to hack on it too feel free to
> send patches of course. thanks.
Andrea,
Personally I think it is too late in the 2.4.x series to integrate your
code.
I have nothing against the code itself (the "old" code also had bugs), but
a major VM rewrite at this point seems to be dangerous if we want a stable
VM.
Don't you agree that your code can introduce new stability bugs ?
Linus, please, if you want to integrate Andrea's code do it in 2.5.x, but
not 2.4.x. (yes, I'm expecting you to scream at me now :))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/