> On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Val Henson wrote:
> > You misunderstood what I meant. This is the first case of one driver
> > supporting two different cards, one 10/100 and one 10/100/1000. All
> > the gigabit cards are 10/100/1000 as far as I know. I still think the
> > driver should be listed in both the 100 Mbit and 1000 Mbit Ethernet
> > menu sections, unless someone comes up with a better idea.
>
> Please do not add duplicate items... put drivers that can do gigabit
> under gigabit. Eventually as we get more of them we can come up
> with better Config.in categories. Besides being an ugly solution,
> duplicating items has the potential to push edge cases in the various
> Config.in parsers.
Actually, I'd say that practically *all* the categories used for ethernet
cards are confusing. I certainly often end up backtracking several times
when configuring a new machine.
Just throwing the lot out and using a flat list would be better than the
current state.
Bad category strategies:
* Brand name. Drivers serve different brands.
* Bus type. Drivers serve cards on different bus types.
* Speed. Drivers serve cards capable of different speeds.
I really don't know what's left.
Unless, of course, mentioning one driver several places becomes possible.
Then all these arguments become irrelevant.
MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/