> On September 6, 2001 03:10 pm, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > [...]
> > to lots on the nfs-data. Even if the nfs-data would only have one single
hit,
> > the old CD image should have been removed, because it is inactive and
_older_.
>
> OK, this is not related to what we were discussing (IO latency). It's not
too
> hard to fix, we just need to do a little aging whenever there are
allocations,
> whether or not there is memory_pressure. I don't think it's a real problem
> though, we have at least two problems we really do need to fix (oom and
> high order failures).
Hm, I am not quite sure about that. Can you _show_ me how to fix this?
Regards,
Stephan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/