Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue

Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Tue, 4 Sep 2001 21:33:48 +0200

On September 4, 2001 07:14 pm, Jan Harkes wrote:
> To get back on the thread I jumped into, I totally agree with Linus that
> writeout should be as soon as possible. Probably even as soon as an
> inactive dirty page hits the inactive dirty list, which would
> effectively turn the inactive dirty list into your laundry list.

No, we don't want that, we need the inactive list as a test of short-term
inactivity. It doesn't make sense to begin the writeout until the page
has made it to the other end of the inactive ist. Otherwise you just
revert to "one-hand-clock".

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/