Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(),

[george anzinger]

Russell King wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:56:31PM -0700, george anzinger wrote:
> > Uh..?  I though that was what I was allowing.  It seems to me to be a
> > lot of extra work to put the same code in 15 different archs.
> > Especially if one does not really know each of them, nor can any one
> > group (or individual) be expected to be able to test (or even have the
> > hardware to test) each of them.
> 
> Umm, my best advice is to look at sys_fork() and do_fork(), sys_execve()
> and do_execve().
> 
Sorry, but none of those system calls requires the registers which is
where the problem is.

George