Don't know. I have to plug a laptop or something on it to test. Perhaps Dad's
PC (but the later is still connected via switched 100 Mbits ;-)
> 10base is theoretically capable of one meg per second,
1.25 MByte/sec (max)
> and experience
> indicates that a 10baseT link normally shows just under 500k per
> second flat out, presumably due to the half duplex nature of the
> 10baseT protocol. I'd expect 10base2 half duplex to be similar, and
> 10base2 full duplex to be somewhat faster.
I thought it should read 10baseT (with RJ45 cable) can reach 1.25 MByte/sec
full duplex (switched)?
>
> > So I changed it under Win to "10baseT" for which the 3Com
> > utilities say "full duplex" enabled.
>
> One slight problem - 10baseT uses CoAxial cable, not RJ45 - and, as
> far as I'm aware, 10baseT is strictly half duplex whereas 10base2
> (which uses RJ45 twisted pair cable) is capable of either half or full
> duplex.
See above.
Thanks,
Dieter
PS Before we go full OT I switch to private mode.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/