>I use bookpcs - all in one, really nice form factor - for build machines,
>firewalls (with a USB ethernet), etc. I used the first generation which
>had intel i810 graphics (sucked) but had fairly typical performance,
>competitive for kernel builds with other current platforms at the time.
>
>I recently bought a couple of the second generation of these boxes, these
>have an SIS 630E based motherboard. This has a much better graphics interface,
>quite reasonable at 1280x1024, and all the other bits work fine under RH 7.1
>without tweaking.
>
>Performance sucks, however. I did an LMbench run to try and figure out why
>and it's obvious - the memory latencies are 430 ns - that's 2x more than
>what is reasonable. I tweaked the various bios settings a bit and could
>not get it to change much, maybe 20ns but not the 200ns I was looking for.
>The fact that this system is running a celeron with a dinky cache makes it
>feel really slow. These boxes with a 633Mhz celeron feel slower than the
>old boxes with a 400Mhz celeron.
>
If there is a problem it appears to be OS, and even processor independent.
I have one of these and had made essentially the same observation as Larry
- that memory bandwidth seems extremely poor.
Larry's mail prompted me to have another look so I installed Win 2k and
ran the Sandra benchmarks - which came up with a memory bandwidth of
130MB/s, about 1/3 of it's reference value for a SiS 630S.
Disk throughput was poor as well, about 8MB/s for a 10G 5400 Seagate
running in Ultra DMA 66. Presumably this is secondary to the lousy memory
bandwidth and (?) points to a bottleneck between chipset & RAM
Mine has a 667Mhz Citrix (Samual I core) and normally runs RH 7.1,
Does anybody else have one?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/