Re: intermediate summary of ext3-2.4-0.9.4 thread

Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 20:26:14 +0200

On Friday 03 August 2001 20:08, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Are you saying that there may not be a ".." some of the time? Or just
> > that it may spontaneously be relinked? If it does spontaneously change
> > it doesn't matter, you have still made sure there is access by at least
> > one path.
> >
> > The trouble with doing this in userland is, the locked chain of dcache
> > entries isn't there.
>
> There is no _locked_ chain.

Locked as in can't be destroyed (refcount) not i_sem or such, sorry for the
loose usage.

> And if you want to grab the locks on all
> ancestors - think again. It means sorting the inodes by address _and_
> relocking if any of them had been moved while you were locking the
> previous ones. I absolutely refuse to add such crap to the tree and I
> seriously suspect that Linus and Alan will do the same.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/