Re: Support for serial console on legacy free machines
Johannes Erdfelt (jerdfelt@valinux.com)
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:50:02 -0700
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001, Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:40:31 -0600 (MDT),
> Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com> wrote:
> >What bothers me is that new systems don't have a serial port, and no ISA
> >slots, so there is no hope of getting a "serial console" support without
> >ACPI (which is rather heavyweight AFAIK). USB is far too complex to use
> >for early-boot debugging, so what else is left?
>
> I briefly discussed this with the USB maintainers at the 2.5 kernel
> developers conference. They thought that a stripped down USB serial
> console was possible, without full USB support. Is that still the
> case?
I think so. Keyboards have a nice feature called boot protocol mode
which is a dumbed down version for BIOS' and the like to use.
What would be needed is a driver for UHCI and OHCI does polling
exclusively, which isn't a big problem and only does control and
interrupt pipes.
I think this can be done with a minimal amount of code. It would
probably be smaller than Linus' original USB driver.
JE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/