Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?

[Riley Williams]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01C11824.3404BEA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Alan, Eric.

>> That's the main thing I'm after right now -- I want to cut down on
>> the false positives in my orphaned-symbol reports so that the
actual
>> bugs will stand out.

> Teach it to read a 'symbolstoignore' file.
>
> Part of the problem you are hitting right now is that most
architectures are
> not yet fully in sync with 2.4 nor likely to all be for another few
iterations.

Not sure if it's relevant, but, I've enclosed (1) a bash script that
produces an analysis of the CONFIG_ variables in a specified Linux
kernel source tree, and (2) the results from running that on the 2.4.5
tree. It analyses all files matching '*.?' and '[Cc]onfig.in' in the
specified tree, and reports on the results by summarising both how
many times each CONFIG_* variable is used total, which files it is
used in, and how many times it is used in each file.

Best wishes from Riley.

------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01C11824.3404BEA0
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
	name="allgrep.gz"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="allgrep.gz"

H4sICMF0SzsCA2FsbGdyZXAAnVLRbtMwFH2Ov+IsdHhDctMiVQiNgKrB0KRqlVDhgaZMruO0loJd
7GRoUP4dJ07DKiYecB7ie319zj3n+slJslY6WXO3JaSotaiU0SiN4JU8O8dPAr8KpXPEg3EMVt3v
JApkZ2Caf5Wgz4ZvKJg5hMtLsTK6UJuh0hTZOfn1AHYjqztue1gnc1CXLL+M2MvbKfvM2Y9VgmRD
8apli6KMRHtUFsyBNl+madRli42VO1zOb66u398+wuJ6mkZMiavr2TvSx5UMevZwxlZghd9936pS
wkqet8W4QG5ItLNKVwXoKXsxcZml/l5zGuP10+ckClx9roPbo9bqG5hoEq3IdJCCdlU03dC2kdxo
edR5qfQf06XYGqT/uTyxqL2uNcZsMD4i2VkjpHvMHsxnb1NK8Wn6IfQnRcmtBFPe5483Cyzmi+ks
HQUbO5v/6WO45vEeOqoKLP0tn41xkvqdp42xukC1lZpEDXZbwvRfZ1HjECYjv+vnUsMIUVvLtZcF
U+DUZdo/FAzadtEQBdRChX8jM/CH+CAragp63EmNFsoDBRnt9I4GJ3IktbOJs4J0th7sqGR4Ycx7
pPi6lEOueXnvlCO/AYntmtFzAwAA

------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01C11824.3404BEA0--