> ext3 stands out because of it's compatibility with ext2 - this makes
> it easy to 'upgrade' from ext2 to ext3 without loosing/moving data.
> Also it would be much easier to move a drive into another machine
> without worrying about the kernel having reiserfs etc compiled in.
Plus, ext2 has *very* good fsck, tested by years.
Last time I ran reiserfsck, it found some errors, but warned me *against*
trying to fix them. I have SuSE7.2 system on reiserfs, and fsck complains
slighlty. System seems to work well. How do I fix it up? Is reiserfsck
really so dangerous as it cllaims?
-- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/