Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.
David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Rusty Russell writes:
> In message <20010723013416.B23517@athlon.random> you write:
> > What kernel are you looking at? There's no such code in 2.4.7, the only
>
> Oh, so it's only a trap *waiting* to happen. That's OK then!
...
> Why not fix all the cases? Why have this wierd secret rule that
> cpu_raise_softirq() should not be called with irqs disabled?
Why keep it secret? I think Andrea is exactly right here, and we
should just comment this restriction. That's all.
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/