Re: [Lse-tech] Re: CPU affinity & IPI latency (FIX)_
Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
On 17-Jul-2001 Hubertus Franke wrote:
>
>
> This only applies only to the idle thread and it says that the idle
> thread actively monitors its need_resched flag and hence will
> instantly call schedule() at that point. Hence there won't be any
> delay either for IPI or for waiting to return from the kernel.
>
> You might be right that the problem situation still arises, because
> the idle_thread needs to content again for the lock.
> Let me ask the otherway around, why do we HAVE to put it in ?
> And if I missed something here, we put it outside the <if> clause.
Yep, we were talking about two different if-locations :)
Anyway, it's right, using the poll idle we've to change the position of the
assignment.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/