> This is what a remedy to be asserted upon a Microsoft must be; simple.
> Rather than interfering with Microsoft innovation, this mechanism would
> mandate the birth of it.
Nope. It might cause microsoft to ensure that nothing remains backward
compatible for as much as five years. True innovation is one way,
obfuscation and needless interface changes and standards
breakage/"extension"
is the easier route. What tends to happen when a competitor implements
some popular standard better than ms does?
> This may actually be relatively attractive to Microsoft.
Perhaps, but not to others, for the above mentioned reasons.
Helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/