> Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> >
> > You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where
you're
> > working with MS products, you were the one who made the decision to do
so.
> > MS is not at fault, claiming so is childish.
>
> Nobody chooses to work with MS, they merely take the job that's offered.
>
> I didn't choose to use MS, I merely chose to be able to pay the rent.
> The choice is basically use MS or don't work in the computer industry.
>
> Hell, I'd even take a pay cut if someone had a Linux job on offer.
> Never seen one... never likely to either in the near future. MS
> completely owns the business world (and it's not like I've not looked
> either, I'd give anything to get out of the job I'm in now but there's
> very few people hiring at the moment).
Actually, I work a Linux Network Manager job, and I support Solaris, Linux,
and MS. MS only because some of the office folk would require more of my
time if Linux is on their system (they can't deal with it). I do have the
choice to put Linux on everyone's workstation and tell them that's what they
must have. Don't tell me I don't have a choice. I make a lot more money
because I support Linux and Unix.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/