Re: RFC: Changes for PCI
Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:27:10 -0400
"Khachaturov, Vassilii" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > However, I think the driver (only going by your
> description) would be
> > more correct to use a pointer to struct pci_dev. We have a
> token in the
> > kernel that is guaranteed 100% unique to any given PCI device: the
> > pointer to its struct pci_dev.
>
> Is it? With a hotplug device removed and another one added,
> isn't there a slight chance that the pci_dev pointer to the new device
> will get allocated in place of the old one?
If you want to get pedantic, yes ;-) The pci_dev pointer is unique for
the lifetime of the PCI device, which works just as well in the example
used in the thread.
--
Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse.
Building 1024 |
MandrakeSoft |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/