Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

[Luigi Genoni]

Yes, but i followed its development till now, and those file are still
present, belive me, when i do compile latest versions.
I am doing beta test of it when i have time,
and i think i tried all versions from 2.7.... times, sometimes sending bug
reports.

On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > The point was that Stimits says that on its Red Hat 7.1 he has no
> > ldscripts directory, and so no files like elf_i386.x and so on.
> > I was just surprised, since i know thay are all necessary to /usr/bin/ld
> > to work.
>
> > two libc
> > /lib/libc.so.6 and /lib/i686/libc.so.6, one is tripped and the other
> > contains debug symbols.
>
>
> Ok that I dont know. The dynamic linker has changed a fair bit over time and
> I don't know enough about it to help
>