Re: What are the VM motivations??

[watermodem]

Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Jason McMullan wrote:
> 
> >       Or heck, let's just make the VM a _real_ Neural Network,
> > that self trains itself to the load you put on the system.
> > Hideously complex and evil?
> 
> Considering the amount of parameters the neural network
> would have to tune, and the fact that there are no easy
> parameters to tune, good luck...
> 

Would never work with the ac-series.  Not enough time
to form a neural pattern between builds.  There is
a semi-prior art here.  Unix on the Tandem (now Compaq) 
Helix shipped (and maybe still does) with a Neural Net
for system sanity and tuning.  Only problem is that 
the learning period usually exceeds the average time
between installing releases (communications customers).  
8^)

Now if it was a FAST LEARNER...

> > the floor, eating that stale cheese doodle. It can't do any
> > worse job on VM that some of the VM patches I've seen...
> 
> You'd be surprised.
> 
> Rik
> --
> Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release:
>    "we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)"
> 
>                 http://www.surriel.com/
> http://www.conectiva.com/       http://distro.conectiva.com/
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/