Re: Threads FAQ entry incomplete

[D. Stimits]

"J.D. Bakker" wrote:
> 
> At 13:42 -0600 20-06-2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> >Rodrigo Ventura <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >  > BTW, I have a question: Can the availability of dual-CPU boards for intel
> >>  and amd processors, rather then tri- or quadra-CPU boards, be explained with
> >>  the fact that the performance degrades significantly for three or more CPUs?
> >>  Or is there a technological and/or comercial reason behind?
> >
> >Commercial reasons.  Cost per motherboard/chipset goes way up as the number of
> >CPUs supported goes up.  For each CPU that a chipset supports, it has to add a
> >lot of pins/lands, and chipsets are already typically land-limited.
> 
> That's not quite accurate. Most modern SMP-able processors have a
> common bus, where going from 1->2 CPUs adds just a handful of extra
> nets (usually bus request, bus grant and some IRQs). The actual
> issues are threefold.

Some SMP chipset/cpu combos allow direct cache-to-cache update when a
dirty cache line is found through snooping, while the lower performance
ones don't. Wouldn't any kind of cache-to-cache direct update that
bypasses the main bus also add physical complexity (extra traces)? And
wouldn't that become more important as the number of cpu's goes up?

> 
> First, most commodity chipsets simply support no more than two CPUs
> at best; most CPUs don't support having more (or any) siblings.
> Adding more is cheap on the ASIC level, but nobody bothers because
> there is no demand.
> 
> Second, adding more CPUs on a shared bus decreases the bus bandwidth
> that is available per CPU. This is comparable with having Ethernet
> hubs vs switches. The really expensive multi-CPU boards have crossbar
> switches between CPUs, memory and PCI. Future stuff like RapidIO may
> mitigate this.
> 
> Third, the more CPUs a bus holds, the higher the capacitance on the
> bus lines. Higher capacitance means lower maximum bus speed, which
> aggravates point two.
> 
> >Motherboard trace complexity (and therefore number of layers) goes up.  Add to
> >that that the potential market goes down as CPUs goes up.
> 
> True enough.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> JDB
> [working on a SMP PowerPC design]
> --
> LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files.
> http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/