> I like to build kernels with a bunch of patches on top to test
> new stuff. The problem is that it takes a lot of effort to fix
> all the failed hunks during patching that really wouldn't have
> to be failed if only patch was a little more inteligent and
> could merge several patches into one ( if possible) or if could
> take into account already applied patches.
The basic problem here is that the "failed hunks" are usually there
because of conflicts between the two patches in question, and as a
result, they are not as easy to merge automagically as one might at
first assume.
> Well, are there any utilities to merge diffs? I couldn't find
> any on freshmeat. So what are you using to stack many patches
> onto the kernel tree? Just manualy modify the diff? I'll try to
> write something more automatic if nothing comes up.
I once came across a utility called "diff3" that was designed to take
a patch for one version of a package and create an equivalent patch
for another version of the same package, but I haven't been able to
find it again since my hard drive crashed.
Best wishes from Riley.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/