On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:39:49PM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> First off, the patch went into a pre-release of the kernel. Never would I
> trust a pre-release to be stable.
The issue is that of interface stability, as I'm sure you know.
> Second of all, if you look at the big picture, you may see the benefit in
> the change that was made. There is an effort to make Linux support power
> management, both at the system-wide level and at the driver level, in a
> much better way than it ever has. These changes are a manifestation of
> that effort.=20
I've no doubt that new and better functions were necessary: but
couldn't it have been done in a source-compatible way? New functions
rather than changed ones?
> Thirdly, these functions are rarely used.
Not every single driver is in Linus' tree.
I didn't see a feature-test macro either: did I miss it?
Tim.
*/
--ABd7dauUP597Mpr3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7KHsnONXnILZ4yVIRApozAJsFUZITfdlOIgp2rsrFN1vZAY21cgCfej4c
ofSluA0hjpBtuvAvzueoA9k=
=RrFS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ABd7dauUP597Mpr3--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/