> > Kelvin (decikelvin?) is probably a good unit to use in the kernel. If you
> > want something else you convert it in the programs you use to interact
> > with the kernel. This is a usespace issue, I think.
> >
>
> Decikelvins is a good bet if we feel that fitting into 16 bits is a
> necessary, or the width of things is limited. Otherwise I would go
> for millikelvins on the general principle that creating interfaces too
> narrow is really painful.
Actually there's one good reasons to use milikelvins:
0 Celsius != 2732 deciKelvin, but
0 Celsius == 273150 miliKelvin ;-)
Pavel
-- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/