Re: [PATCH] Reap dead swap cache earlier v2

[Hugh Dickins]

On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, John Stoffel wrote:
> Shouldn't the "swap_count(page) == 1" check be earlier in the if
> statement, so we can fall through more quickly if there is no work to
> be done?  A small optimization, but putting the common cases first
> will help.

I don't think so: the out-of-line swap_count() function is considerably
more complicated than the macros and inline functions tested before it.

Hugh