Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch

Marc Lehmann (pcg@goof.com)
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:24:36 +0200


On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:10:02PM +0100, Adrian Cox <adrian@humboldt.co.uk> wrote:
> > data corruption was easily detectable, one couldn't even write 500megs
> > without altered bytes).
>
>
> Wrong way round. You're right that the pci master is supposed to handle
> delayed transactions, but during data transfer the pdc is the pci master
> and the northbridge is the PCI target.

Ok, so it could be the promise controller (the controller, however, worked
for a long time in another board with no via chipset and pci delayed
transactions enabled, so I guess it is not only dependnet on the promise
controller).

and this means that there is no automatic workaround, since not all
systems seem to have this problem.

I *do* hate silent data corruption :()

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@goof.com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/