Nope. BSD manual pages (the authentic ones anyway) say that the timeout value
may well be written back but that this was a future enhancement and that users
shoulsnt rely on the value being unchanged.
> in the man page (but does not state either way what will happen to the
> bits), zeros the users bit masks when a timeout occurs. I have written a
> test case, and run on both systems; BSD behaves as stated, Linux does not
> act like BSD.
>
> Should the man pages be changed to reflect reality, or select() fixed to
> act like BSD?
BSD should stop changing its mind if its changed its man pages
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/