Re: unresolved symbols printk ?

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Wed, 30 May 2001 00:55:11 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Baumann: "Problem with minor devices numbers in 2.4.4/68k"
Previous message: aaron: "VIA Samuel problem? 2.2.19,2.4.4"
Maybe in reply to: Nico Schottelius: "unresolved symbols printk ?"
Next in thread: Nico Schottelius: "Re: unresolved symbols printk ?"

On Tue, 29 May 2001 15:54:36 +0200,
Nico Schottelius <nicos@pcsystems.de> wrote:
>Just a small question, what could be the reason I have a broken
>Makefile ?
>This seems to happen frequently, if there is a need
>to name it into the lkml. I am surprised
>a makefile gets screwed up ?

It is the makefile design for modversions that is broken. The entire
makefile system is being redesigned and rewritten from scratch for
kernel 2.5.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Baumann: "Problem with minor devices numbers in 2.4.4/68k"
Previous message: aaron: "VIA Samuel problem? 2.2.19,2.4.4"
Maybe in reply to: Nico Schottelius: "unresolved symbols printk ?"
Next in thread: Nico Schottelius: "Re: unresolved symbols printk ?"