Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac2

[Mike Galbraith]

On Mon, 28 May 2001, Leeuw van der, Tim wrote:

> The VM in 2.4.5 might be largely 'fixed' and I know that the VM changes in
> -ac were considered to be but still broken, however for me they worked
> better than what is in 2.4.5.

The VM changes in 2.4.5 fixed a very serious performance problem.  IMHO,
2.4.5 is a step in the right direction.  (and I hope more steps are in
the offing;)

> I have a rather aging P5MMX at 200MHz with 64MB RAM, and I'm only judging
> interactive use (not measuring anything like compile times etc).

Interactive performance became a problem here exactly at the point when
we stopped waiting for the vm to produce results.  (which rather sucks,
because that's also the spot where throughput improved [non-suprise])

	-Mike