Re: 2.4.5-ac1 hard disk corruption... acpi responsible?

green@linuxhacker.ru
Mon, 28 May 2001 11:01:09 +0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Sasi Peter: "RE: Kernel 2.4.x TODO"
Previous message: Antwerpen, Oliver: "Dual Athlon Performance"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.5-ac1 hard disk corruption... acpi responsible?"

In article <E1544AG-00026i-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote:
> Bad idea. The kernel ACPI is not the most debugged, the ACPI in many BIOSes
> is complete garbage and there isnt a lot you can do to debug them either.
> APM is a definite better choice, at least in the shorter term
Too bad, we cannot get much of APM in SMP, only power-off if one gets lucky.

Bye,
Oleg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sasi Peter: "RE: Kernel 2.4.x TODO"
Previous message: Antwerpen, Oliver: "Dual Athlon Performance"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.5-ac1 hard disk corruption... acpi responsible?"