Re: [PATCH] 2.4.5pre3 warning fixes

[Albert D. Cahalan]

Bingner Sam J. Con writes:

> Looks to me like it's adding { and } on each side of the
> "c->devices->prev=d;" statement... so changing from:
> 
> if (c->devices != NULL)
> 	c->devices->prev=d;
> 
> to 
> 
> if (c->devices != NULL){
> 	c->devices->prev=d;
> }
> 
> I assume the new compiler likes the if to have explicit
> brackets instead of using the next statement...

Maybe one of these will make it happy:

(void)(c->devices && (c->devices->prev=d));

!c->devices ?: (c->devices->prev=d);