It's a real card.
> I don't think eepro100 has got much testing with rev > 9, though it should
> have worked. All eepro100 chips are supposed to be backwards compatible with
> the 82557, but maybe our driver initializes some registers in a way that
> upsets newer chips. Not having docs for the newer chips doesn't help,
> either...
>
> Intel's own e100 driver probably works, their code does things differently if
> rev >= 12 (what they call the D102 revision). Give it a spin, I guess.
For various reasons that are far to boring to go into here, I'm not entirely
free in my choice of card. What I'll probably do is try to get a rev 8 card
swapped in for the rev 12 one. If I can't get a rev 8 card for that machine,
I'll go with the e100 driver and let you know what happens.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/