Yesterday, Timothy A. Seufert (tas@appsig.com) wrote:
> Why not take it a step further than just devices? This is a perfect
> model for supporting named forks.
Because this only works on filesystems where directories can't themselves
have named forks (or streams, or whatever you wish to call them)
associated with them.
Read the archives on this issue :)
Mo.
- --
Mo McKinlay mmckinlay@gnu.org http://ekto.org
Read http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjsCod0ACgkQRcGgB3aidflJyQCfdjh+o8vZvzZLfowM5QoLGICy
tmAAoMIF4DcyqTep43Hd2/9X9tfeIH9X
=cKMC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/