Mystery speed: Was Re: 3c590 vs. tulip

[Dan Mann]

> Sounds like a serious bug. Consider reporting it.

I'll do some more concrete testing this weekend.  Don't get me wrong, if
computers can do what I want before even I know it, I'm happy :-)

Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andi Kleen" <[e-mail]>
To: "Dan Mann" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: 3c590 vs. tulip

>
> > faster machine it is much slower.  Images take at least .5 to 1 second
to
> > load when they are stored locally.  But over the network, with 2.4.4 and
> > samba 2.2, It's as if the server "knows" what I'm going to ask for
before I
> > actually do.  Is this normal?  I honestly don't think it was this fast
when
> > server was on 2.2 Kernel with samba 2.07.
>
> Sounds like a serious bug. Consider reporting it.
>
> -Andi