Re: Not a typewriter

[Jonathan Lundell]

At 8:07 PM -0400 2001-05-10, Alexander Viro wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
>>  ENOTTY is used by several non-serial devices (or file systems) to
>>  object to an unrecognized ioctl command. There's also ENOIOCTLCMD
>>  (apparently supposed to be a non-user errno, but i don't see where it
>>  gets changed to something else) and EINVAL. I'm not sure what the
>>  rationale is for choosing among them; perhaps someone would elucidate?
>
>ENOIOCTLCMD is something I've never met in the kernel. Normal reaction
>to unrecognized ioctl() is ENOTTY, for a lot of reasons, starting with
>the fact that ioctls are last-ditch API to be used when you just can't
>think of better one and historically TTY had the earliest (and largest)
>infestation. IOW, "not a tty" used to mean "WTF are you using ioctls here?"
>OTOH, EINVAL is a catch-all thing for "something is wrong with arguments".

That's pretty much what I would have said a couple of hours ago 
before grepping the kernel. Try it, though. ENOTTY is rarely used. 
ENOIOCTLCMD is all over the damned place, though its comment in 
errno.h warns that a user shouldn't see it. And if you browse a bunch 
of random ioctl handlers, you'll see EINVAL used for a bad command 
much more often than ENOTTY.

FWIW, the comment in errno.h under Solaris 2.6 is "Inappropriate 
ioctl for device". I believe that's the POSIX interpretation.
-- 
/Jonathan Lundell.