Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3
Steve Lord (lord@sgi.com)
Wed, 09 May 2001 16:25:40 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] (updated) ext2 directories in pagecache"
- Previous message: Mark Bratcher: "ATAPI Tape Driver Failure in Kernel 2.4.4, More"
- Next in thread: Pekka Pietikainen: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Reply: Pekka Pietikainen: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
>
> XFS is very fast most of the time (deleting a file is sooooo slow its like us
> ing
> old BSD systems). Im not familiar enough with its behaviour under Linux yet.
Hmm, I just removed 2.2 Gbytes of data in 30000 files in 37 seconds (14.4
seconds system time), not tooo slow. And that is on a pretty vanilla 2 cpu
linux box with a not very exciting scsi drive.
>
> What you might want to do is to make a partition for 'mystery journalling fs'
> and benchmark a bit.
>
> Alan
>
I agree with Alan here, the only sure fire way to find out which filesystem
will work best for your application is to try it out. I have found reiserfs
to be very fast in some tests, especially those operating on lots of small
files, but contrary to some peoples, belief XFS is good for a lot more than
just messing with Gbyte long data files.
Steve Lord
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] (updated) ext2 directories in pagecache"
- Previous message: Mark Bratcher: "ATAPI Tape Driver Failure in Kernel 2.4.4, More"
- Next in thread: Pekka Pietikainen: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Reply: Pekka Pietikainen: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"