Re: page_launder() bug

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 7 May 2001 11:52:26 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bene, Martin: "RE: what causes Machine Check exception? revisited (2.2.18)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"

> > It is the most straightforward way to make a '1' or '0'
> > integer from the NULL state of a pointer.
>
> But is it really specified in the C "standards" to be exctly zero or one,
> and not zero and non-zero?

Yes. (Fortunately since when this argument occurred Linus said he would eat
his underpants if he was wrong)

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bene, Martin: "RE: what causes Machine Check exception? revisited (2.2.18)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"