I did - and with a lot of interest
> I agree that a better threading model would surely help in a web server, but to
> me this is not an excuse to live up with a broken scheduler.
The problem has always been - alternative scheduler, crappier performance for
2 tasks running (which is most boxes). If your numbers are right then the
HP patch is working as well for 1 or 2 tasks too
> Unless we want to maintain the position tha the only way to achieve good
> performance is to embed server applications in the kernel, some minimal help
> should be provided to goodwilling user applications :)
Indeed. I'd love to see you beat tux entirely in userspace. It proves the
rest of the API for the kernel is right
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/