The same piece of code exist in the proc
filesystem, here the bug has not been fixed.
I wonder why does the function exist in the
proc filesystem, shouldn't proc be able to
use the default permission cheks?
I have also found a lot of bugs in the file
arch/i386/kernel/vm86.c, this is not mentioned
in the maintainer list. Is there a maintainer
I can send a bug report to? If not I will try
to fix the bugs on my own.
-- Kasper Dupont - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/