Now, wait, Jeff. I'm not attached to Peter's change, but I don't think
we can reasonably be expected to worry about every possible driver
left over from every old version of Linux when managing the
configuration-symbol namespace. That way madness lies.
I'll cheerfully ship a supplementary patch to fix this one name later,
but we can't afford to have a wrangle over this bit of trivia delay
adoption of this one. I have a hell of a lot of work to do for
which this is critical path.
I left it pretty late as it is, out of hope that other people would
clean up some of the messes I noticed in the config namespace six
months ago, and they did -- but the 2.5 fork is nearly upon us and I
feel a strong need to get this in before then.
Would you and Peter please fight this out and tell me what to do in the
supplementary patch? I don't care, as long as the result has a non-numeric
prefix -- bare "8139whatever" is out.
-- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? -- Thomas Jefferson, in his 1801 inaugural address - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/