Re: Linux should better cope with power failure

[Otto Wyss]

> I had a similar experience:
> X crashed , hosing the console , so I could not initiate
> a proper shutdown.
> 
> Here I must note that the response you got on linux-kernel is
> shameful.
> 
Thanks, but I expected it a little bit. All around Linux is centered
around getting the highest performance out of it and very low (to low
IMHO) is done to have a save system. The attitude "It doesn't matter
making mistakes, they get fix anyhow" annoys me most, especially if it
were easy to prevent them. 

> What I did was to write a kernel/apmd patch , that performed a
> proper shutdown when I press the power button ( which luckily
> works as long as the kernel works ).
> 
Not with a AT power supply but certainly nice to have. See that it gets
included into the kernel. I didn't lost anything important since it was
just a testing machine. I was just shocked what fsck complained on a
machine which hadn't done almost anything at all. If I'd run into this
on a productive system I'd get immediately a serial keyboard or have at
least a usable network connection. Besides USB-only is not ready yet.

> > Don't we tell children never go close to any abyss or doesn't have
> > alpinist a saying "never go to the limits"? So why is this simple rule
> > always broken with computers?
> >
Is there a similar expression which could be hammered into any
developers mind, i.e. "Don't make errors, others already do them for you".

O. Wyss