Re: Question about memory usage in 2.4 vs 2.2

[Jan Harkes]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:01:52AM -0600, Josh Grebe wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I have a server farm made of identical hardware running pop3 and imap mail
> functions. recently, we upgraded all the machines to kernel 2.4.2, but we
> noticed that according to free, our memory utilization went way up. Here
> is the output of free on the 2.4.2 machine:
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
> Mem:        513192     492772      20420          0       1684     263188
> -/+ buffers/cache:     227900     285292
> Swap:       819304        540     818764
> 
> 
> On the 2.2..18 machine:
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
> Mem:        517256     351280     165976      19920      82820     186836
> -/+ buffers/cache:      81624     435632
> Swap:       819304          0     819304
> 
> 
> Doing the math, the 2.4 machine is using 44% of available memory, while
> the 2.2 is using only about 14%.

What does /proc/slabinfo report for the number of pages locked down in
the inode and dentry caches? My machine has pretty much every inode in
memory and is using close to 50% of my memory for these (214MB/512MB).

These caches do not seem to be counted towards 'reclaimable' memory by
the new VM and are only pruned when _all_ other attempts to free up
memory have failed.

This becomes very noticeable on a not very fast, small memory machine
(i.e. 48MB sparc-IPC), where 2.2 stays relatively snappy, but 2.4
becomes unusable after an updatedb run.

Jan