Re: [CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1

[Neil Brown]

On Friday March 16, [e-mail] wrote:
> Here are some more results from the MC project.  These are 16 errors found
> in 2.4.1 related to inconsistent use of locks.  As usual, if you can
> verify any of these or show that they are false positives, please let us
> know by CC'ing [e-mail].
> 
> -Andy Chou
> 
> | fs/nfsd/vfs.c                   | nfsd_link                  |
> | fs/nfsd/vfs.c                   | nfsd_symlink               |

These are not actually bugs.  The usage of fh_lock is fairly obscure.
The unlock gets done by an fh_put which the caller does after calling
nfsd_link or nfs_symlink.

NeilBrown